Connect with us

CRICKET

Learnings from India vs Leicestershire Day 2

Published

on

India faced Leicestershire as part of their preparations for the final Test match against England that starts on July 1.

We have seen 2 days of long format cricket by the Indians so far.

The performances from the Indians have been a mixed bag so far.

What’s happened so far

Four Indian players are representing Leicestershire – Cheteshwar Pujara, Rishabh Pant, Jasprit Bumrah and Prasidh Krishna.

This was the only way the Indian squad could get some match practice as there is only one match scheduled before the Test.

On Day 1, the Indian batting crumbled as they lost 5 wickets for just 81 runs.

A steady half-century from KS Bharat (70 not out) took India to 246/8 at stumps on Day 1.

Bharat found support from Umesh Yadav (23) and Mohammed Shami (18 not out) in stands of 66 and 32.

Roman Walker, the 21-year-old right-arm seam bowler who moved from Glamorgan to Leicestershire last year bagged 5 wickets for 24.

His scalps included star batters Virat Kohli and Rohit Sharma.

Eventually, rain forced an early end to Day 1.

Leicestershire responded with 244 thanks to a blistering 76 off 87 balls by Rishabh Pant.

Pant took on the seamers, scoring 26 off 30 balls from Shami, 20 off 23 against Siraj and 13 off 12 when facing Umesh.

It was vintage Pant with classy extra-cover drives, paddle sweeps off the quicks and improvised short-arm jabs

Shami and Jadeja grabbed 3 wickets each.
One of Shami’s victims was Pujara who got out for a duck.
India replied with 80 for 1 with KS Bharat unbeaten on 31.

Worrying signs for India

While the bowlers have looked impressive, the batters are still looking rusty.
Worryingly, there is no other practice game scheduled and they have very little time to get ready. Rohit began the day watchfully but one again got out caught at mid-wicket, trying to hook a short ball.
Rohit had managed to eliminate these lapses in concentration on the last England tour but looks like the bad habit has returned. Shubman Gill and Shreyas Iyer edged the ball while playing away from their bodies, a technical flaw which Anderson and co. will make a note of.
Iyer lasted just 11 balls before falling for a duck, playing a loose drive well away from the body against Prasidh.

Though Kohli made 33, it looked like he didn’t know where his off stump was and looked like edging the ball many times.

Hanuma Vihari lacked scoring intent and took 22 balls to score 3 runs.

This ultra defensive mindset might work on Indian pitches but in seaming conditions, only increases the pressure on the batters.

Jadeja was caught LBW on the crease to an inswinger, trapped right in front.
Even in the second innings, Shubman Gill fell victim to a loose shot, playing away from the body, thanks to the extra bounce generated by Navdeep Saini.
Apart from the solid batting displays of the wicket keepers, KS Bharat and Rishabh Pant, the rest of the line up needs to buck up very fast.
Squads India vs Leicestershire CCC

India: Rohit Sharma (Capt), Shubman Gill, Virat Kohli, Shreyas Iyer, Hanuma Vihari, KS Bharat (wk), Ravindra Jadeja, Shardul Thakur, Mohammed Shami, Mohammed Siraj, Umesh Yadav.

Leicestershire CCC: Sam Evans (Capt), Rehan Ahmed, Sam Bates (wk), Nat Bowley, Will Davis, Joey Evison, Louis Kimber, Abi Sakande, Roman Walker, Cheteshwar Pujara, Rishabh Pant, Jasprit Bumrah and Prasidh Krishna.

Indians 246 for 8 dec (Bharat 70, Walker 5-24) and 80 for 1 (Gill 38, Bharat 31*) lead Leicestershire 244 (Pant 76, Jadeja 3-28, Shami 3-42) by 82 runs

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

BIG NEWS

Nepal Premier League Becomes a Watershed Moment for Nepali Cricket

Published

on

By

The NPL marks a milestone for Nepali cricket, bringing new opportunities and excitement to the sport!

The NPL has become a watershed moment for Nepali cricket, elevating the sport to new heights. With its success, the league has brought national and international attention to Nepali cricket, attracting a broader fan base and better sponsorships.

This landmark event showcases the immense talent present in Nepal and provides a platform for local players to shine. The league has paved the way for a new generation of cricketers to gain recognition and advance their careers in the sport.

The NPL has also given Nepali cricket more global exposure. International players joining the league help raise the level of competition, further inspiring the local players. The league’s popularity continues to grow as it evolves and promises to be a cornerstone of Nepali cricket in the years to come.

As the league progresses, it is expected to inspire future stars and increase the overall development of cricket in Nepal. Fans eagerly follow every match, enjoying the thrilling action and supporting their favorite players and teams.

In conclusion, the Nepal Premier League has transformed Nepali cricket, setting the stage for future growth. This momentous development will surely lead to even greater success for Nepali cricket on the international stage.

The NPL has also sparked interest in domestic leagues across emerging cricket nations. It serves as a model for other countries to develop their cricketing infrastructure and provide young talent. As the NPL continues to grow, it is expected to play a vital role in shaping the future of Nepali cricket.

Fans have embraced the tournament, creating a sense of national pride. The NPL’s rise reflects the growing global interest in domestic cricket leagues and their role in nurturing future talent. It’s a significant milestone for Nepali cricket, ensuring that the sport will continue to evolve in the coming years.

Continue Reading

BGT

Simon Katich Criticizes George Bailey’s Call to Axe Nathan McSweeney from Australian Team

Published

on

By

Simon Katich Criticizes George Bailey’s Call to Axe Nathan McSweeney from Australian Team

Simon Katich has sharply criticized George Bailey’s decision to drop Nathan McSweeney from the Australian team. Simon Katich believes this call was a poor decision, especially after McSweeney’s consistent performance. Bailey’s choice has sparked discussions about the selection process and the reasoning behind it.

McSweeney’s exclusion has raised eyebrows, with many questioning why a player with such promise was dropped. Katich, in particular, feels that Bailey’s decision to axe McSweeney is questionable, especially when compared to the struggles of other top-order batters. Both teams in the recent series have faced challenges with their top-order batting, but the Australian selectors decided to make this change.

Katich’s comments reflect growing concerns about the selection strategy and the impact of dropping McSweeney. He pointed out that many players have struggled with their form, yet McSweeney was chosen to be left out. This, Katich argues, highlights the inconsistency in the decision-making process.

Top-order batters in both teams have faced difficulties, with neither side managing to produce consistent runs. Despite these struggles, the decision to remove McSweeney has left fans and experts questioning the rationale behind the move. Some believe that dropping McSweeney might have been premature, given the form of other players.

Katich’s criticism brings attention to the broader issue of player selections in international cricket. As teams prepare for future series, these decisions are likely to influence the direction of Australian cricket. The focus now shifts to how Bailey and the selectors will handle similar challenges in upcoming matches.

The debate continues, with many calling for more transparent and consistent decision-making regarding player selections in international cricket.

Continue Reading

BGT

Steve Smith and Travis Head Address BCCI’s Influence in Cricket

Published

on

By

Steve Smith and Travis Head discuss BCCI's influence in cricket, raising debates about power and fairness in the sport.

Steve Smith recently commented on BCCI’s influence in cricket, sparking debates about its significant role in global governance. During a media interaction, Smith remarked that the International Cricket Council (ICC) appears less powerful than the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI). This statement drew attention, prompting Smith to clarify his intentions quickly.

Smith acknowledged that the BCCI holds a dominant position in cricket due to its financial and organizational contributions. He pointed out how the Indian board influences key decisions that shape the sport. However, Smith softened his tone, emphasizing that his comments were not meant as criticism of either the ICC or the BCCI.

Travis Head, Smith’s Australian teammate, also addressed BCCI’s influence in cricket. Head humorously referred to the Indian board as “rulers,” recognizing its ability to set global standards in cricket. He highlighted the board’s pivotal role in defining policies and establishing benchmarks for the sport.

These remarks have reignited discussions about power dynamics in international cricket. Critics argue that the BCCI’s financial clout often overshadows smaller cricketing nations. They believe this imbalance can hinder fair representation in decision-making. On the other hand, supporters emphasize the BCCI’s critical role in expanding cricket’s global reach and popularity.

As India hosts the ICC Cricket World Cup, the spotlight remains on the BCCI’s influence in cricket. The board’s central role in shaping schedules, policies, and trends continues to drive conversations about equity in the sport. Smith and Head’s remarks reflect ongoing concerns about maintaining fairness and inclusivity in global cricket governance.

Their comments underscore the need for balanced representation to ensure a fair future for cricket.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 Wolf777news.